19 April 2008

An interesting online metronome


www.webmetronome.com

I like it because it allows you to work with BPM slower than the usual 30-40 BPM offered by most metronome designers. Programmable beat patterns are also cool.

Postscript: Having received some rather astonished reactions to this post, here a few of my thoughts on the subject of metronomes. I am quite sure that musicianship meant something else than we are generally accustomed to today in the classical world, before the metronome (commercially available in a portable form from ca. 1810) was fully integrated into music instruction (probably rather late in the 19th century, although I don't know of any research on this topic).

My interest in metronomes is two-fold: Certain metronomes (in particular Dr. Beat, and now this online web metronome) can be programmed to click at very slow rates. For example MM=15 represents one beat per bar at quarter-note=MM60 in 4/4 time. I use a very slow beat to train myself to play freely within the bar, while maintaining an awareness that I will have to (in principle) land together with the metronome beat on the next downbar. This kind of musical tension is altogether different than playing with a quicker beat, but also different from trying to play freely, without regard for an underlying pulse. In a way, you could say that the one-beat-per-bar practice method instills skills necessary for the development of tempo rubato in its stricter sense of making up what you have stolen. See also Roger North on the "grand beat" (although we can't say for sure that a slow pulse is what he had in mind).

As far as the programmable beat patterns are concerned, I am simply fascinated by tools that allow me to control what they do easily. I could see this metronome as quite useful for learning bits of the Carter Sonata, for example, or other 20th-C. pieces that have frequent meter changes. But even in the 18th century there is the tradition of Imbroglio which allowed for patches in one meter to be inserted in a movement in another meter. J. S. Bach, for one, is often to be found experimenting with displaced accents that amount to a temporary meter change.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Robert Hill recommending a metronome?? This cannot be true (or can it?).

Maby this is some kind of joke???

Is it really Robert Hill who says: "Programmable beat patterns are also cool."
???

Robert, you've got to explain this!

Do you use a metronome? When and how often?
How does it influence your playing? Are there things for which you really need a metronome? What are they?
Are you not worried that a metronome will pre-impose bad interpretative traits? That it might have bad long-run effects: that it might hinder creativity and hinder a musical finesse by imposing phrasing around static beats? You're using a tool that has been criticized by many, many composers!

Regards,
Early Music fan

Anonymous said...

Hi there Robert!

I'm almost certain that it's a joke that you're recommending a web-metronome!

The reason is that you say you like it, because it allows ticks lower than 30 BPM, but it is almost impossible to synchronize one's playing to such slow beats.

But I'm still worried that you might actually be serious!

Have I misunderstood? What is the benefit of the metronome?

Anonymous said...

Hi Robert!

Thanks for responding with a Postscript! Very gracious!

At the expense of seeming picky-choosy, which is not the intent, here are some thoughts on your postscript.


Robert Hill wrote: "I use a very slow beat to train myself to play freely within the bar, while maintaining an awareness that I will have to (in principle) land together with the metronome beat on the next downbar."

Who ever decided that one is to play music, so that one duration of every bar is to be equivalent?

Robert Hill wrote: "This kind of musical tension is altogether different than playing with a quicker beat, but also different from trying to play freely, without regard for an underlying pulse."

Who ever said that one cannot
"play freely (without metronome), while still keeping an underlying pulse"?

Robert Hill wrote: "In a way, you could say that the one-beat-per-bar practice method instills skills necessary for the development of tempo rubato in its stricter sense of making up what you have stolen."

Who ever said that the "stolen time" during the flow of a bar, has to be given back during that very same bar?

You mention:
Roger North on the "grand beat"

Robert, I do believe that your playing is absolutely superb, and that you know what you're doing!

However I'd don't know if it helps young musicians (students) to talk about select aspects of music in "matter of fact" terms, e.g. with regards to rhythm/pulse/metronome... etc.; since students often take this information completely out of context and begin practising only these "matter of fact" things (metronome) ...; forgetting about the art/soul/heart/communication/evocation of emotions parts of making music.

Regards,
~ MusicInterpretation

Anonymous said...

For your information:
Metronome (from Wikipedia)

Thesis (pdf available):
The Metronomic Performance Practice: A History of Rhythm, Metronomes, and the Mechanization of Musicality; by Alexander Bonus

Anonymous said...

For your information:

Metronome page from wikipedia

The Metronomic Performance Practice: A History of Rhythm, Metronomes, and the Mechanization of Musicality; Thesis by Alexander Bonus

Anonymous said...

Metronome (Oxford Handbooks Online) (altern.) by Alexander Evan Bonus (April 2014)

Anonymous said...

Great, I see the Oxford Handbooks article on the metronome is now available free of cost:
Metronome (Oxford Handbooks Online)